Not Nostradamus?

I cannot say I am Nostradamus, but I did say I was nostraBUSHus or some such words. At this time my search evades me.

Here though: I cannot say that I definitely did not hear any reference to Paul Krugman's suggestions,(I am pretty sure I didn't) but I take it a bit further. However, I do know it did not reach my inbox till yesterday*.

* truthout.org link a redundancy of Rollingstone's Paul Krugman's above(Reference being to Truth and Reconciliation. Not to mention cycle

[Update: a different moment and an alternative to forget: not*** (back to frame of reference or satire?) The point is the table. And bring it on the...]
[Translation to update and my way: I strongly suggest reading the Krugman Letter to Obama embedded in the above redundancy and no dis to these last two links, but they do reflect alternative theories to the economy and justice. But rather than "harbor a suspicion" I'll suspect not.]
[Put another way? I rather endorse a Rumsfeld** attitude of healthy debate, but with an open mind and eyes and ears, there is no point in a table if the heat of light is not brought there. Where there is smoke, there is fire, but that does not mean visibility will improve or that some of the information is not going up in smoke.]

** I won't footnote this but just explain it as his heated attitude he thought was healthy, yet predetermined.

*** seemingly the only alternative to Truth and Reconciliation or to Forgive and Forget and a very good bibliography

HINT: for those unfamiliar with my style I wish everyone to read Paul Krugman's Letter to Obama found twice at the first asterisk above , however the bottom "Link" below, takes us back to the epitome of chastened as well as my style of unweaving our Hamlet and sometimes maybe just scrolling over or CUTTING through THIS.

Flow of Conscience

Not Exactly Either,
nor Out of the Box.
Speaking of Supply and Demand
or trickle down and bubble up.
No Dead C Scroll over, nor out.

Just a hint that things are not black and white,
nor up without down, let alone level or limited.
The original trigger was a conversation at a holiday party,
which I wished to amend here,
while John Dean and William James[***] were part of the head water or ledership.

[Speaking of flow, and roots or branches.]

[See Three Comments]
[Seg Way: E pit o'me[!]
/ I will now slightly edit a bit of above,
without adding any links as after thoughts unless noted.(see italics)]

[For the scroll-over challenged*, I will list the links in order...
(under construction I through XIX)
I Sciousness, wiki.
II Pandora, wiki.
III Theodicy, wiki.
IV Supply, blog search
V Demand, ibid.
VI slippery slope, ibid.
VII Power Broker, ibid.
VIII scroll, ibid.
IX ibid.,ibid[?]
X "Conservatives without Conscience"
XI "The Liberal Conscience"
XII Try-Unism
XIII google find "liberal conscience Dean"/Howard
XIV ibid. /Baker
XV "X & Y Chromo Somes", my blog
XVI "Image of Original In Tent", ibid.
XVII December 2011 archives, ibid.
XVIII "A PEAS Meant", ibid.
XIX "Post Script", ibid.
SEGUE:
Seg Elizabeth Warren replies to Karl Rove
Way Her way (video).
Epitome
[!] Sat Ire
A bit frayed at the edges.

*or to save you a trip

[See Comments up to the sixth, then I was Roving my web pages and found this. Speaking of Prophetic Tributes. Innocence bUy...to the good fight.]
[Speaking of frayed.**]

** see Seg Way source LA Times.
[***] 12-13-11 Correction to James(not Blake)

The People's Business?

Bush today: “Sometimes politics gets in the way of the people's business.” Speaking of “on the one hand” or “on the other hand”, I was torn between thinking of it as the nadir or zenith, but it seems the core of his logic.

He wants his nominee and he wants it now.

So much for "strict father", sounds like pre-tantrum baby.

Further comment would have to rely on the “cause and effect” of whatever he means. And which comes first? People or business. Not to mention whatever the alternative to politics is. This seems the epitome or Dao(Dow) of cutting through and being full of it.

I could have done without a link, but there is possilby some link to the question of which comes first.